Platform-controlled social media APIs threaten open science | Nature Human Behaviour
Nature Human Behaviour volume 7, pages 2054–2057 (2023)Cite this article
1143 Accesses
12 Citations
101 Altmetric
Metrics details
Social media data enable insights into human behaviour. Researchers can access these data via platform-provided application programming interfaces (APIs), but these come with restrictive usage terms that mean studies cannot be reproduced or replicated. Platform-owned APIs hinder access, transparency and scientific knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Publizistik Open Access 01 July 2024
Scientific Reports Open Access 14 February 2024
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Walker, S., Mercea, D. & Bastos, M. Inf. Commun. Soc. 22, 1531–1543 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Lazer, D. et al. Nature 595, 189–196 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. et al. This sample seems to be good enough! Assessing coverage and temporal reliability of Twitter’s academic API. In Proc. 17th International AAAI Conf. on Web and Social Media (eds. Lin, R.-Y. et al.) 720–729 (AAAI Press, 2023).
Bastos, M. Am. Behav. Sci. 65, 863–883 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Acker, A. & Kreisberg, A. Arch. Sci. 20, 105–123 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
John, N. A. & Nissenbaum, A. Inf. Soc. 35, 1–12 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Freelon, D. Polit. Commun. 35, 665–668 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Leerssen, P., Heldt, A. & Kettemann, M. C. in Challenges and Perspectives of Hate Speech Research (eds. Strippel, C. et al.) 405–425 (Digital Communications Research, 2023).
Sen, I., Flöck, F., Weller, K., Weiß, B. & Wagner, C. Public Opin. Q. 85, 399–422 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Bruns, A. Inf. Commun. Soc. 22, 1544–1566 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
De Vreese, C. & Tromble, R. Polit. Commun. 40, 356–360 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
Ohme, J. et al. Commun. Methods Meas. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2023.2181319 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
Krotov, V. & Silva, L. Legality and ethics of web scraping. In Americas Conf. on Information Systems, https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2018/DataScience/Presentations/17 (2018).
Fiesler, C., Beard, N. & Keegan, B. C. No robots, spiders, or scrapers: legal and ethical regulation of data collection methods in social media terms of service. In 14th International AAAI Conf. on Web and Social Media, 187–196 (AAAI, 2020).
Download references
These authors contributed equally: Darja Wischerath, Daniel Racek, Douglas A. Parry.
School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, UK
Brittany I. Davidson, Darja Wischerath, Emily Godwin, Joanne Hinds & Laura Ayravainen
Department of Statistics, Ludwig Maximilians Universität München, Munich, Germany
Daniel Racek
Department of Information Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Douglas A. Parry
Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK
Dirk van der Linden
BT Applied Research, Ipswich, UK
Jonathan F. Roscoe
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
Alicia G. Cork
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
B.I.D. conceptualized the work; B.I.D., D.W., D.R., J.H. and D.A.P. wrote the original draft; B.I.D., D.R., D.A.P., D.W., E.G., J.F.R., J.H., D.v.d.L., A.G.C. and L.A reviewed and edited all later versions of the manuscript.
Correspondence to Brittany I. Davidson.
This work was part-funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC grant ref: EP/W522090/1) as a PhD studentship to D.W. as an EPSRC iCASE with B.I.D. and J.F.R. This work also was part-funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC grant ref: EP/SO22465/1) as a PhD studentship to E.G. via the CDT in Cybersecurity TIPS-at-scale. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Nature Human Behaviour thanks Cornelius Puschmann, Amelia Acker and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Reprints and permissions
Davidson, B.I., Wischerath, D., Racek, D. et al. Platform-controlled social media APIs threaten open science. Nat Hum Behav 7, 2054–2057 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01750-2
Download citation
Published: 02 November 2023
Issue Date: December 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01750-2
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Scientific Reports (2024)
Publizistik (2024)
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry (2024)
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry (2024)